![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-10bZLjzCmgS7daVyH1pNvYhFfai1HeynkCxJ2wtUGpYa627887qxujwxLWv2PvV-LBHz69PN762hPX0rlRNNDOCm3_x6itAWPM05pPdl_ecRK_Dvo4YP59bslbQ_rPJuGi-WKTbW8Dg/s320/kenya_prec1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg29Wps3xOY0OwtCUuOaq1ye6xZkSRJNX6JgGg3lXCANgO16tHJtWD5AlsnuXMRYsfEiNzk9D9yKSgcW3le9GU723l0JPPeGL6N4bqINAkYrYigIvpq25fm1G5R1ibttBYxO92pLksozIg/s320/Mass2.jpg)
This map illustrates the distribution of people who have multiple ethnicity in the City of Buffalo by census tract. I chose a light gray color for the background and a light yellow for the census tracts. The symbol choice reflects my desire not to use a circle and to avoid a square. It is evident from the symbol sizes where there is a cluster of multiple ethnic peoples. With my experience from the previous map the arrangement of the legend was a little easier. The most challenging part of the exercise was the back and forth of size values. It would be interesting to compare this map with the map from lab 1.
The above map illustrates the distribution of the predominant ethnicity by census tract within the City of Buffalo. I am content with the map, overall. It is, in my mind, well-balanced. I did find some areas of improvement starting with the title. Even in the original I avoided using the word race (I am an anthropologist, so technically, there are no "races."), but using the word dominant in describing ethnicity sound a little creepy. The correct word is predominant. I also removed by census tract from the title to shorten it. In the legend I gave it a title to mention that the geographical units are census tracts. Also, I changed the scale bar units to miles; we are in the United States. Finally, since the map is representing a clipped area, I added a background color. The below map is my revised one.